Allowed

Deepak v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC2 May 2023BAIL/10540/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court in a bail application allowed the release of the applicant Deepak involved in offences under IPC and POCSO. The court considered contradictions in prosecution statements, lack of criminal history, and likelihood of trial delay, granting bail subject to conditions without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each subject to standard bail conditions.

Deepak Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:99429

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10540 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Deepak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kamlesh Kumar,Mrityunjay Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

¶8

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that a concocted and false story has been set up by the prosecution whereas the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that there is contradiction in the statement of victim recorded under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. as well as in the F.I.R. lodged by the informant. It is further submitted that ingredients of offences are absent and entire prosecution story is based on false and frivolous allegations. It is further submitted that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.01.2023 and he has no criminal history.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submits that prima facie offence against the accused applicant is made out and in case applicant is release on bail, he will misuse

¶10

the liberty of bail, but, he could not disputed the aforesaid facts.

¶11

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused, looking to the delay in conclusion of trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant Deepak involved in Case Crime No. 1083 of 2022, under Sections 307, 354, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. and section 7/8 of POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station Highway , District Mathura be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶13

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶16

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶17

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶18

Order Date :- 2.5.2023

¶19

Bhanu

¶20

Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Deepak v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Naeem Vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhan@ Shahbaz Vs State of U.P.

Ranvijay Vishwakarma Vs State of U.P.

Vijaypal Vs State of U.P.

Tilak Singh Vs Union of India

Yusuf @ Andha Vs State of U.P.