In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under sections 307, 325, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC, the High Court examined false implication arguments but held them applicable only to regular bail, leading to rejection of the application.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:138495
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 977 of 2023
Applicant :- Rinku Yadav @ Praveen Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
been touched upon at length.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 13.7.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an affray case involving multiple accused.
Whether arguments concerning false implication and specific role during trial are maintainable at the anticipatory bail stage.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rinku Yadav @ Praveen Kumar Yadav
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
