An anticipatory bail application was filed. The applicant withdrew the prayer for anticipatory bail, seeking only a direction for expedited hearing of the subsequent bail application. The court disposed of the application issuing the requested direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:192323
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9479 of 2023 Applicant :- Dinesh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashutosh Pandey
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 6.10.2023 // Krishna*
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of with a direction that the regular bail application be heard and disposed of expeditiously.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶7
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
Dinesh And 2 Others
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
