Dismissed

Mukesh Sahu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2023ABAIL/8796/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. The order confirms the applicant's guilt of violating previous conditions, rejecting their plea for bail and formally designsates the order as 'sustained' despite potential textual irregularities.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application dismissed; order granted previously not cancelled but rendered unsustainable.

Mukesh Sahu Vs State of U.P. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:198255

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8796 of 2023

¶5

Applicant :- Mukesh Sahu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Yash Pratap Singh,Birendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jai Prakash Singh

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 456 o"kZ 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 307] 452] 506] 323 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk dklxat] ftyk dklxat esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶8

2&okn iqujhf{kr lwph esa iqdkjk x;kA vkosnd dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk mifLFkr ugha gS tc fd oknh dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSA

¶9

3&foi{kh la[;k 2 dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶10

4&foi{kh la[;k 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;k ,oa rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ukfer vfHk;qDr gSA iz'uxr ekeys esa vkosnd ds fo:} /kkjk 82 na0 iz0 la0 ds vUrxZr dk;Zokgh gks pqdh gSA

¶11

5&fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk nkf.Md izdh.kZ vihy la[;k 1340

¶12

o"kZ 2019] ih0 fpnEcje~ izfr izorZu funs'kky;] fu.khZr fnukad 9&9&2019 esa ;g fl}kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd vfxze tekur mUgha ekeyksa esa nh tkuh pkfg, ftuesa vfHk;qDr ds fo:} yxk;s x;s vkjksi vk/kkjghu rFkk QthZ izrhr gksrs gSA

¶13

6&fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; dh fof/k O;oLFkk nkf.Md vihy la[;k 1209 o"kZ 2021] izse'kadj izlkn cuke fcgkj jkT;] ,oa yoys'k izfr LVsV ¼,u- lh- VhfnYyh½] 2012 ¼8½ ,l0 lh0 lh0 730 ij fo'okl djrs gq, rdZ

¶14

¶15

izLrqr fd;k x;k fd ;fn vfHk;qDr HkxksM+k ?kksf"kr gks x;k gS vkSj mlds fo:} /kkjk 82 na0 iz0 la0 dh dk;Zokgh py jgh gS rks bl vk/kkj ij og vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA vkosnd ekuuh; mPpre }kjk mijksDr ekeys esa fn, x;s fn'kk funsZ'k ds vuqikyu esa vfxze tekur dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

¶16

7& pw¡fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl}kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd ;fn vfHk;qDr HkxksM+k ?kksf"kr gks x;k gS vkSj mlds fo:} /kkjk 82 na0 iz0 la0 dh dk;Zokgh py jgh gS rks bl vk/kkj ij og vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

¶17

8& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶18

9& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA Order Date :- 13.10.2023 A.

¶19

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukesh Sahu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Sahu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Kumar Pandey and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Smt Neelesh Parihar@ Neelu Vs State of U.P.

Chotu @ Dharmendra Yadav and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Prakash Singh @ Deepak Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Premchandra Patel Vs State of U.P. and Another