Rajesh Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the applicant, a bank employee accused of automating a bank note, citing the legal principle that bail is necessary when there is no material to anticipate arrest, noting the applicant had already moved the same court previously.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to surrender at police stations, not tamper with evidence, and remain in India unless absent without leave.