The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous due to the applicant's counsel stating the matter was rendered so. The court also noted taking appropriate legal action against the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8529 of 2022
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rishabh Kesarwani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that this application has been rendered infructuous and the same may dismissed as such.
In view of the aforesaid statement, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
The court shall take appropriate action in accordance with law against the applicant.
Order Date :- 17.1.2023 A.Kr.
Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
