Single judge order dismissing anticipatory bail application due to applicant's complicity, delayed filing, and non-cooperation with the trial court proceedings.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; two weeks time granted to surrender and file a bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:147898
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8240 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohd. Hamja Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- M J Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 25.7.2023 RavindraKSingh
Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in cases of offences under sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 and 120-B IPC.
Whether the delay in filing the application and complicity of the accused precludes the grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether the applicant is a fit case for anticipatory bail considering the pendency of trial and issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Hamja
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Ravindra Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
