Suresh Chaudhary v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 821 of 2020
Applicant :- Suresh Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Kesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Mr. Prakash Chandra Diwedi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Hari Kesh Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned AGA for the State.
Earlier on 28.01.2020, interim anticipatory bail application was granted to the applicant.
Learned AGA has pointed out that that the charge sheet has already been submitted against the applicant, therefore, the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
To which, learned counsel for the applicant prays that this anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as provided under the law.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 24.1.2023 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Chaudhary
State Of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
Jitendra Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court