Disposed

Hasimuddin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Jul 2023ABAIL/8048/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court disposed of the petition after the applicant requested withdrawal of anticipatory bail relief. Instead, the court directed the lower court to hear the applicant's bail application expeditiously relying on Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with direction to the lower court to decide the bail application expeditiously.

Hasimuddin Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:143457

¶2

Court No. - 71

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8048 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Hasimuddin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

Sri Sameer Khan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant today in the Court, the same is taken on record.

¶7

Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Sameer Khan learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for State as well as perused the material available on record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the applicant for protection in regard to Case Crime No.104 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 308 I.P.C., P.S.Rehra, District- Amroha, during the pendency of investigation.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that he does not want to press the prayer for release of the applicant on anticipatory bail. His sole prayer is that a direction may be issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the applicant in view of the judgement in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, the

¶12

present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that in case the applicant filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below in view of the settled law laid down by this court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶13

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 19.7.2023 Krishna*

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hasimuddin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasimuddin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gola @ Golu @ Neeraj Prajapati Vs State of U.P through Principle Secretary ,Home, Govt. of U.P

Surendra Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohd Khalid Vs State of U.P.

Shobha Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Aakash Vs State of U.P. and Another

Yogesh Vs State of U.P. and Another