The anticipatory bail application was disposed of because the parties were aggrieved by the filing of the application, as disputes had already been amicably settled through the Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
The anticipatory bail application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:194561
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7383 of 2023
Applicant :- Rajeev Ranjan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 9.10.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajeev Ranjan
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
