The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an anticipatory bail application dated 23.1.2023 due to want of prosecution, as no representative appeared to press the matter after the applicants were already on anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 727 of 2022
Applicant :- Rohdas And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Surjeet Singh Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
List has been revised. No one is present from the side of applicant to press this anticipatory bail application even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A for the State is present.
From the perusal of record, it appears that the applicants were on anticipatory bail during the pendency of this application.
Learned A.G.A submits that in this case after conclusion of investigation the charge sheet has been submitted, therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
In the revised call, it also shows that the applicants are not interested to press this anticipatory bail application, hence this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.1.2023 G.S
Digitally signed by :- GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohdas And 2 Others
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
