Dismissed
Rajul v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCABAIL/7046/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC as the applicant, having no counsel present on multiple occasions, was deemed no longer interested in pressing the application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 73
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7046 of 2020
¶3
Applicant :- Rajul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
¶5
- List revised. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
¶6
- It appears from the order sheet that the accused applicant is no more interested to press the present anticipatory bail application. On the earlier date also, none was present on behalf of the applicant.
¶7
- Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed .
¶8
Order Date :- 23.8.2023 Shivangi
¶9
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rajul
Coram
AI extract
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/7046/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court