Bakey Lal v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Allahabad dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as having become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:219910
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6671 of 2023
Applicant :- Bakey Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
- Sri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and it may be dismissed, accordingly.
- In view of aforesaid, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 20.11.2023 S Rawat
Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bakey Lal
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6671/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court