The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant argued that it was no longer necessary.
The application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:140817
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6546 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohd. Kaushar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Diwan Saifullah Khan,Abhishek Ankur Chaurasia
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.7.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Kaushar
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
