Anticipatory bail application under Section 438Cr.P.C. rejected as the applicant had already filed and subsequently lost a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition challenging the charge sheet, making the case covered by precedent Shivam.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:113317
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5860 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohd Ahmad Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Udai Shanker Mishra,Mohammad Khalid Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 23.5.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case involving dowry harassment and cruelty during the pendency of trial.
Whether the applicant has relinquished the opportunity to challenge the charge-sheet by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shivam vs. State of U.P. and AnotherReferred¶8
Shivam vs. State of U.P. and Another
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Ahmad Khan
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
