Applicant sought anticipatory bail. Applicant had already obtained regular bail. Court held application infructuous and dismissed it.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5738 of 2023
Applicant :- Vijendra @ Vire @ Bijendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Dwivedi,Noor Muhammad,Yogesh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Learned A.G.A. pointed out that the applicant has obtained regular bail, therefore this anticipatory bail application has become infructous and it may be dismissed as infructious.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructious.
Order Date :- 26.7.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application should be dismissed after the applicant has obtained regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijendra @ Vire @ Bijendra Singh
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
