This anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was already granted bail by the trial court, rendering the prayer redundant.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:210491
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5674 of 2021
Applicant :- Shefali Sharma Opposite Party :- C.B.I And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Pandey,Priyanka Midha,Ram M. Kaushik Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None present for applicant.
Shri Gyan Prakash, learned Deputy Solicitor General assisted by Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for CBI is present.
It has been pointed out by learned counsel for CBI that as per instructions, applicant has already been granted bail by the trial court.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Sharad/-
Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shefali Sharma
C.B.I
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
