Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel did not appear to press the application.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101380
Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5673 of 2021
Applicant :- Man Pal Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Mangal Singh,Pankaj Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in revised list.
No one appears on behalf of applicants to press this application for bail.
Learned A.G.A. for State is present.
The matter has been taken out of turn on the mention made by the learned counsel for applicant.
In view of above, application for bail fails and is liable to be dismissed.
It is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 10.5.2023 HSM
Digitally signed by :- HARI SHANKER MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Man Pal Singh
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
Hari Shanker Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
