On 12.1.2023, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application. The court observed that no one was present from the applicant's side to press the application, leading to a decision of dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4948 of 2022
Applicant :- Safi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shanti Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
List has been revised. No one is present from the side of applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Learned A.G.A as well as learned counsel for the opposite party N.2 is present.
On the previous date, none was present to press this anticipatory bail application and even today none is present on behalf of applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Therefore, It appears that the applicant is not interested in pressing this anticipatory bail application.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.1.2023 G.S
Digitally signed by :- GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Safi
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
