This court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Pankaj Rai as infructuous. The single judge observed that since the applicant had already been arrested, the application no longer served its purpose.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4520 of 2022 Applicant :- Pankaj Rai Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Rai,Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sharad Chand Rai
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
List has been revised. No one is present from the side of applicant. Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sarad Chand Rai, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 as well as learned A.G.A for the State is present.
Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sarad Chand Rai, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submits that in this case the applicant has been arrested, therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.1.2023
G.S
Digitally signed by :- GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application is maintainable when the applicant has already been arrested.
Pankaj Rai
State of U.P.
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
