Disposed

Yadav Ram Yadav v. State of U.P. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC1 May 2023ABAIL/4475/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by directing the applicant to file a regular bail application within one month or upon surrender, relying on Supreme Court guidelines, and prohibited coercive action during this interim period.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted as interim relief with direction to surrender within one month and file regular bail application.

Yadav Ram Yadav Vs State of U.P. State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 83

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4475 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Yadav Ram Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Kumar Shukla,Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

List has been revised.

¶6

Heard Sri Gaurav Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.K. Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶7

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 80 of 2022, under Sections 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S.- Dubauliya, District- Basti.

¶8

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶11

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶12

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶13

Order Date :- 1.5.2023 Shalini

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yadav Ram Yadav v. State of U.P. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yadav Ram Yadav v. State of U.P. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangotri Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashwin Tripathi Vs State of U.P through Secretary Home and Another

Mahendra Kumar Sahu @ Rinku and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Keshav Sharma Vs State of U.P.and Another

Prem Narayan Vs State of U.P.

Mukul Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others