The Allahabad High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed directly without prior refusal by the Sessions Court, finding no special circumstances justifying direct approach under Ankit Bharti precedent.
Prayer for anticipatory bail refused; application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117662
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4463 of 2023
Applicant :- Sunny Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
this Court directly without having any rejection order from the Court of Session.
Order Date :- 26.5.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are compelling or special circumstances to approach the High Court directly for anticipatory bail without a rejection order from the Sessions Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. and anotherDistinguished¶10
Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. and another, 2020 (3) ADJ 165 (F.B.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunny Kumar and 2 Others
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
