Dismissed
Satish Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/4411/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:133955 Court No. - 73 Case :-…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2023:AHC:133955 Court No. - 73 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133955
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4411 of 2023
Applicant :- Satish Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vijay Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Shishir Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want press the present anticipatory application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present anticipatory application is dismissed as not pressed.
This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the informant.
Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Akbar
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Kumar
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court