Justice Krishan Pahal dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous due to significant delay and lack of applicant participation, citing Supreme Court directions on time-bound disposal.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:154232
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3452 of 2023
Applicant :- Munesh Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Tabassum Hashmi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 2.8.2023/Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed under S. 438 Cr.P.C. is infructuous due to inordinate delay.
Whether the interim protection previously granted, if any, stands vacated.
Munesh Kumar Sharma
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
