The High Court dismissed the petition because the applicant's counsel submitted that the investigating officer is not attempting to serve notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., indicating no apprehension of arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:186889
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2397 of 2023
Applicant :- Inderpal Singh Sachar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jyoti Kumar Singh,Sr. Advocate,Vishakha Pande Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mahipal Singh
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
It is submitted by the learned A.G.A. that the I.O. is trying to serve the notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. to the applicant but he is not available at the address given.
Since the police is not making any attempt to arrest the accused applicant, he has no apprehension of arrest in the matter.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no need to proceed further in the matter. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.9.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Inderpal Singh Sachar
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Fahad Niyaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
