In this anticipatory bail application regarding FIR u/s 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court rejected the plea. The court held that the applicant had taken a fake claim for his truck, making it an open and shut case. Consequently, the application was found devoid of merits and rejected.
The anticipatory bail application is rejected on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:108964
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1988 of 2022
Applicant :- Rizwan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pavan Kishore Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
his truck, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 18.5.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present case is a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Whether the applicant's submission that the allegation of fake claim is false merits the granting of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rizwan
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
