Allowed

Smt. Archana Tyagi v. State of Up

Allahabad HC26 Sept 2023ABAIL/14405/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, a co-accused facing multiple charges. The court considered prior bail history thwarted by another High Court and imminent arrest circumstances, directing specific conditions of surrender without bail and no outsider contact.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on conditions of immediate surrender at trial, no weapon possession, no outsider contact, and notice to other High Courts.

Smt. Archana Tyagi Vs State of Up — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:186018

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14405 of 2021

¶5

Applicant :- Smt. Archana Tyagi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Singh,Anurag Pathak,Harshit Pathak

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosfndk dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 521 o"kZ 2013] vUrxZr /kkjk 420]406] 467] 468] 471] 120chHkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk gkiqM nsgkr] ftyk gkiqM esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosfndk dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶8

2&vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA 3&vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd orZeku ekeys esa vkosfndk dh vfxze tekur bl U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 8&11&2021 }kjk vxyh lwph c} gksus rd Lohdkj dh x;h vkSj nkSjku foospuk] vkosfndk ds fo:} vafre vk[;k U;k;ky; izsf"kr dh x;h ijUrq fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk mDr vafre vk[;k dks vLohdkj djds bls LVsV dsl ds :i esa Lohdkj djrs gq, vkosfndk dks fopkj.k gsrq vkgwr dj fy;k gS tks fof/k laxr ugha gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd iz'uxr izkFkfedh esa vkosfndk lfgr vkB yksx uketn gS ftuesa ls nks yksxksa dh tekur fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS rFkk 'ks"k yksxksa dh vfxze tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd iz'uxr ekeys esa mHk; i{kk s a ds e/; ,d eq'r le>kSrk gks x;k gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosfndk vfxze tekur ikus dh vf/kdkfj.kh gSA

¶9

4&ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lq'khyk vxzoky izfr jkT; ¼,ulh-Vh- fnYyh½ 2020 ,l0 lh0 lh0 vkuykbZu ,l0 lh0 98 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] vkosfndk dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj O;Dr fd;s vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶10

¶11

5&rnuqlkj vkosfndk Jherh vpZuk R;kxh dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶12

6&mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k esa vkosfndk dh fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa mls lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh larqf"V ij :i;k ipkl gtkj dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk;sxk%&

¶13

¼1½ vkosfndk fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxhA

¶14

¼2½ vkosfndk xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxhA ¼3½ vkosfndk fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxhA

¶15

7& ;fn vkosfndk }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosfndk dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶16

Order Date :- 26.9.2023 A.

¶17

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Archana Tyagi v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Archana Tyagi v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priyanka Vs State of U.P.

Harendra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Sharda Devi Vs State of U.P.

Choncha @ Mohd. Hasib Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mustaq Ali and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Abhishek @ Rohit Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others