The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., directing the applicant to surrender within one month and to file a regular bail application decided under Satender Kumar Antil.
Direction to surrender within one month; no coercive action for that period; direction to file regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235773
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13764 of 2023
Applicant :- Danveer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mayank Yadav,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application requires interference under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar AntilReferred¶9
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 · Who else cites this
Danveer
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal
Parties & counsel
