The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nadeem in a case involving assault, criminal conspiracy, and attempted murder. The court held that the available material did not demonstrate malafide intent in the FIR's lodging, leading to the dismissal of the plea.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13575 of 2022
Applicant :- Nadeem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Mishra,Shashi Kant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avnish Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
7. It is made clear that observations made herein shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion at any stage of the case based on material before him.
Order Date :- 16.2.2023 #Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case of criminal conspiracy and attempted murder.
Whether the nature of the case involving cross-FIRs and grievous injuries warrants refusal of anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nadeem
State of U.P.
Another
Jyotsna Sharma
Vikram Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
