In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the court disposed of the matter by directing the applicants to file a regular bail application within one month and prohibiting coercive action during that period.
Direction to file regular bail application within one month and immunity from coercive action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1278 of 2023
Applicant :- Rakesh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajneesh Kumar Sharma,Vinod Shankar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jai Shanker Malviya
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 21.8.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application should be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application.
Whether no coercive action should be taken against the applicants for a specific period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶10
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh
Smt. Neelam
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
