In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court rejected the petitioner's claim that the FIR was false or lodged for ulterior motives, citing sufficient prosecution evidence and the filing of a chargesheet.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; no bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12708 of 2022
Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Agrawal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 15.2.2023 Asha
Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in view of prosecution evidence and lack of material to show false implication.
Whether the FIR was lodged for ulterior motives or to bring disgrace.
Whether the filing of chargesheet and taking of cognizance precludes the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Chandra Agrawal
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
