Anticipatory bail application allowed on grounds of parity with a co-accused. Applicant to furnish bond and comply with conditions regarding trial attendance and non-interference.
Granted anticipatory bail on personal bond with two sureties subject to specific conditions for the duration of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:217280
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12558 of 2023
Applicant :- Ajay Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Mani Srivastava,Ravindra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for anticipatory bail. The anticipatory bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.
i. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;
iv. that in case, the charge-sheet is submitted, the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
v. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness; vi. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail on the ground of parity with a co-accused who was already granted bail in the same case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P.Referred¶10
1993 Crl.L.J. 938
Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶10
MANU/SCOR/22410/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay
State Of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
