The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by applying the principles from Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, directing the lower court to decide the pending bail application expeditiously instead of granting anticipatory bail.
Direction to the court below to decide the applicant's bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:221280
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12456 of 2023
Applicant :- Rifakat Ali Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 22.11.2023 RavindraKSingh
Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail and direct the lower court to decide the bail application expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil principles.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶8
2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
Rifakat Ali Khan
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
