This court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by Sakir in a POCSO and IPC case alleging molestation of a minor. The court held it was not a fit case for the extraordinary remedy.
The anticipatory bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11909 of 2022 Applicant :- Sakir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Bahadur Singh,Shashank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 9.1.2023/Asha
Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the prima facie makeout of the offence.
Whether the alleged false implication and prior antecedent constitute sufficient grounds to grant anticipatory bail.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Sakir
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
