The application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the court as it had become infructuous before adjudication.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199885
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11869 of 2021
Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Chandra Prakash Pandey,Dharmendra Kumar Patel
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application should be allowed or dismissed as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Kumar Yadav
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Shivangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
