Satyendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. admitted. Evidence on oath was recorded. No reasons for grant or refusal are stated in this text. No formal order or disposal appears.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:219097
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11839 of 2023
Applicant :- Satyendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Vashistha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
1- यहपककररअगगमजममनतपमररनमपत, आववदकककओरसवमम०अ०सस० 120 वरर 2023, अनतररतधमरम 420, 467, 468, 471, 120- बबभम०दस०सस० रमनमज व र, जजलमरगतमबमदनररममअगगमजममनतककमममरकरतवहहएइस यमचनमकवसमरपसतमतगकयमरयमहहगकगररफतमरबककदशमममआववदककक जममनतपरररहमगकयमजमसकव।
2-आववदककवगवदमनअजधवकमएवसरमजयककओरसवगवदमनअपरशमसककय अजधवकमककसमनमएवसपतमवलबकमअवलककनगकयम।
3- पररनमव अगभयकजनकरमनकससगकपममइसपकमरहहगकगममरबबपमरम, तहसबलज व र, रगतमबमदनररससरतखमतमससखयम 93 रमटमससखयम 1495 कवतफल 1.3880 हव०भबगमकवखमतवदमर/भब०सवममबओमवतबपतनबसगरमजकम नममरमजसवअगभलवखखममअसगकतहह।पशरतभबखणडसवसमबसनधतपतमवलबकक कमयमरलययबडमकवसमकपसतमतकरनवममससजलपवयगकयखदमरमछलकपटएवस फजरवमडमकरपशरतरमटमससखयमककभबगमकवपगतकरककधनरमगश, जकयबडम ककभबगमगवकयककवतरममनदरखकवआधमरपरलरभरचमरकरकडकवआसपमस हकतबहह, ककहडपनवकवउदवशयसवकबटरचनमकरफजरआधमरकमडर, मबलभब सवममबओमवतबककफजरफकटकवसबएसबबबबक, अशककगवहमरनईगदलबकव बमसचकवबबकपमसबमकककपगत, ससलगकरतवहहएपशरतभबगमककयममनम एकसपवसववऔदकगरकगवकमसपमजधकररगवटरनकएडमकवपकममआपरमजधक रडयनतपबवरकचबगटसरऔरठरबकरतवहहएगवजधगवरदढसरसवगवकयकरनवकम पयमसगकयमरयमहह।
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant apprehending arrest in the pending proceedings.
Whether the alleged facts satisfy the requirement of prima facie case and reasonable apprehension of arrest.
Whether the granting of bail is mandatory under the circumstances explained by the applicant.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satyendra
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11839/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court