Allowed

Vishnu Gaur v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2023ABAIL/11736/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Vishnu Gaur regarding cheating allegations, granting bail until the end of the trial subject to specific conditions including a personal bond and restrictions on foreign travel.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted till the end of trial on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties and complying with specific conditions.

Vishnu Gaur Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:215563

¶2

Court No. - 73

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11736 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Vishnu Gaur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Srivastava,Saksham Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶7

Apprehending his arrest, the present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Vishnu Gaur in Case Crime No.22 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Gabhana, District Aligarh, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has apprehension of his arrest in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against her. He has been falsely implicated into this matter. Allegations levelled against the applicant are false. The investigation of the case has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed. It is further submitted that earlier protection was granted to the applicant by this Court till filing of police report u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. No. - 6626 of 2023 vide order dated 17.7.2023 and the applicant has not misused the liberty granted to him. It is also submitted that there is no exact timing of the occurrence and the money taken from the aggrieved persons has been deposited in the bank account of his father, the co-accused Sudhir Gaur and not in the bank account of the present applicant as alleged in the F.I.R. itself. It is further submitted that C.O., Gabhana had also made an inquiry on the complaint given by the informant and in the inquiry report, he concluded that no cogent evidence was found regarding the allegations made in the F.I.R. The applicant has been cooperative during the course of investigation. He has not been declared proclaimed offender by the trial court. No process under sections 82, 83 Cr.P.C. has been issued against the applicant. It is further submitted that no custodial interrogation is required in this matter from the applicant. Applicant has no criminal antecedents and as such he is entitled for anticipatory bail.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶10

Although charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter, but in Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another, (2020) 5 SCC 1, the Hon'ble Apex Court has settled the controversy finally by holding the anticipatory bail need not be of limited duration invariably. In appropriate case, it can continue upto conclusion of trial.

¶11

It has been further held therein that anticipatory bail granted can, depending on the conduct and behavior of the accused, continue after filing of the charge sheet till end of trial.

¶12

It has been further held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that while considering an application for grant of anticipatory bail, the court has to consider the nature of the offence, the role of the person, the likelihood of his influencing the course of investigation, or tampering with evidence including intimidating witnesses, likelihood of fleeing justice, such as leaving the country, etc. It has further been held that Courts ought to be generally guided by considerations such as the nature and gravity of the offences, the role attributed to the applicant, and the facts of the case, while considering whether to grant anticipatory bail, or refuse it. Whether to grant or not is a matter of discretion.

¶13

Hence, considering the settled principles of law regarding anticipatory bail, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusation, role of applicant and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case, in my view, it is a fit case for anticipatory bail to the applicant till end of the trial in the matter.

¶14

The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶15

In the event of arrest of the applicant in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till end of the trial on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶16

(i) The applicant shall make himself available before the court concerned on the date fixed in the matter;

¶17

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him / her from disclosing

¶18

such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶19

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. Concerned.

¶20

In case of default of any of the conditions, same may be a ground for cancellation of protection granted to the applicant.

¶21

Order Date :- 6.11.2023 ss

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vishnu Gaur v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu Gaur v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Vishwakarma Vs State of U.P.

Akash Shivhare Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sushila Devi Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Jagiya @ Vimla Devi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Santosh Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mohammad Akram @ Akram and others Vs State of Up and Others