High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application as the offences punishable were up to seven years imprisonment, and a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:215282
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11671 of 2023
Applicant :- Sharafat Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Avdhesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application should be disposed of given the offences are punishable with seven years imprisonment and notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was issued.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and anotherFollowed¶8
(2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
Md. Asfak Alam Vs. State of Jharkhand & AnrFollowed¶8
2023 INSC 660 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Sharafat Ali
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
