Court disposed of anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. instead of granting bail, directing the lower court to hear and decide the applicant's bail application expeditiously relying on Supreme Court precedent.
No bail granted. Direction to lower court to decide bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:223914
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11580 of 2023
Applicant :- Sunil Chauhan @ Anil Singh Chauhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 28.11.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail or direct expedited hearing of bail application based on precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922. · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Chauhan
State Of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
