Disposed

Karam Husain v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Oct 2023ABAIL/11179/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of the second anticipatory bail application filed under S. 438 Cr.P.C. granting liberty to file a regular bail application in accordance with the guidelines of Satender Kumar Antil. The applicant was directed to surrender within four weeks, during which no coercive action would be initiated.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail disposed of with liberty to file regular bail; applicant directed to surrender within four weeks; no coercive action to be taken.

Karam Husain Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:201824

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11179 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Karam Husain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sharda Babu

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Saghir Ahmad, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Sharda Babu, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

This is the second anticipatory bail application filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 149 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307 of I.P.C., P.S.- Dudhara, District- Sant Kabir Nagar.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Siddhant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Karam Husain v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karam Husain v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vineet Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Richa Verma and Another Vs State of U.P.

Dheeru Trivedi @ Dhirendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Tawwad @ Tauwab Husain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Abdul Wahid Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shri Bhushan Mishra and Another Vs State of U.P.