Allowed

Keshav Prasad Pandey v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Oct 2023ABAIL/11150/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C., noting his advanced age, health issues, and seclusion. The court imposed conditions requiring presence at police stations and prohibiting outside communication without police knowledge.

What did the court decide?

Approval of anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with conditions regarding communication and presence at police stations.

Keshav Prasad Pandey Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205529

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11150 of 2023

¶5

Applicant :- Keshav Prasad Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1&vkosnd dh vksj ls iwjd'kiFk i= nkf[ky fd;k x;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A mDr iwjd 'kiFki= ds izLrj 2 esa ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd vkosnd ds fo:} dksbZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA

¶8

2&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k lh&6 o"kZ 1999 vUrxZr /kkjk 409] 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk fxjoka] ftyk ckank esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶9

3&la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd jke vkljs xke lHkk vtqZukg dk iz/kku gS ,oa ds'ko izlkn ik.Ms; o xaxk izlkn ;kno iwoZ lfpo jgs gSaA jke vkljs iz/kku us ds'ko izlkn ik.Ms; o xaxk izlkn ;kno ls lkaB&xkaB djds xzke lHkk vtqZukg dh tks jde tokgj jkstxkj ;kstuk ds vUrxZr fodkl ds fy, Lohd`r Fkh] mldk nq:i;ksx djds QthZ dkxtkr cukdj viuk LokFkZ fl} djus ds fy, jde gMi yh gSA oknh dh f'kdk;r ij [k.M fodkl vf/kdkjh egqok ckank us tkap dh Fkh vkSj ftlesa ;g ik;k x;k fd mDr yksxksa us 1995&96 ,oa 96&97 esa izkIr /kujkf'k ls iz/kku }kjk eqcfyx ,d yk[k fN;Rrj gtkj nks lkS vBkucs :i;s QthZ C;; fn[kk;k x;k ftldk ewY;kadu 97 gtkj 332 :i;s 30 iSlk gqvk FkkA bl rjg ls 79 gtkj 63 :i;s 70 iSls dh /kujkf'k vius futh dk;ksZ esa [kpZ djds nq:i;ksx fd;k gSA o"kZ 97&98 ,oa 98&99 esa tokgj jkstxkj ;kstuk ds vuqlkj n'ke foRr vk;ksx [kMatk fuekZ.k iapk;r vkfn enksa esa izkIr /kujkf'k ,d yk[k pkSgRrj gtkj ukS lkS bdlB :i;s QthZ C;; n'kkZ;k x;k gS tc fd lgh jde tks [kpZ gqbZ gS ,d yk[k ckjg gtkj rhu lkS iUnzg :i;s cgRrj iSls gSA bl rjg ls 62 gtkj 645 &28 iSlk dk xcu fd;k gSA

¶10

¶11

4&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA 5&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosnd us dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA iwoZ esa iz'uxr ekeys esa vkjksi i= nkf[ky fd;k x;k Fkk] ftlds fo:} vkosnd ,oa lg&vfHk;qDr xaxk izlkn ;kno }kjk izkFkZuki= vUrxZr /kkjk 482 la[;k 5397 o"kZ 2002 bl U;k;ky; esa ;ksftr fd;k x;k ftlesa bl U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 4&6&2002 ds }kjk fo}ku voj U;k;ky; dh vfxze dk;Zokgh dks LFkfxr dj fn;k FkkA blh izdkj lg&vfHk;qDr xaxk izlkn ;kno }kjk bl U;k;ky; esa ,d fuxjkuh ;ksftr dh x;h ftlesa bl U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 31&10&2001 ds }kjk voj U;k;ky; dh vfxze dk;Zokgh dks LFkfxr dj fn;kA

¶12

6&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku voj U;k;ky; ds vkns'k i= ftls bl izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk layXud 5 ds :i esa vuqlayXud fd;k x;k gS dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k ftlesa dze'k% vkns'k fnukad 29&11&2021] 30&3&2022 ,oa 16&7&2022 esa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd izdj.k dh dk;Zokgh ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ls LFkfxr gS ijUrq vxyh fu;r frfFk 4&11&2022 dks vkosnd ds fo:} vuqifLFkr gksus ds dkj.k xSj tekurh; okj.V tkjh dj fn;k x;k gSA blh izdkj iqu% vxyh fu;r frfFk 23&5&2023 dks vkosnd ds fo:} vuqikfLFkr gksus ds dkj.k vUrxZr /kkjk 82&83 dh vknsf'kdk;s tkjh dh x;h gSA

¶13

7&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku vius izkFkZuk i= ds izLrj 11 dh vksj vkd`"V fd;k x;k ftlesa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd fnukad 16&7&2022 rd iz'uxr ekeys esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr LFkxu vkns'k izHkkoh jgk gS vkSj tc vkosnd }kjk iz'uxr xSj tekuh; okj.V fnukafdr 4&11&2022 ds ckjs esa irk fd;k x;rks Kkr gqvk fd vkosnd ds fo:} /kkjk 82&93 na0 iz0 la0 dh dk;Zokgh gks pqdh gSA blds iwoZ vkosnd dks bl lEca/k esa dksbZ tkudkjh ugha FkhA bl vk/kkj ij vkosnd ds fo:} tks xSj tekurh; okj.V ,oa /kkjk 82&83 na0 iz0 la0 dh dk;Zokgh dh x;h gS mlds lEca/k esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosnd tkucw> dj voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha gqvk gSA vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk

¶14

¶15

;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosnd l= ijh{k.k esa ln~Hkkoh :i ls mifLFkr gksdj lg;ksx djsxkA vkosnd ,d lsokfuo`Rr deZpkjh gS orZeku esa mldh vk;q 72 o"kZ gS vkSj dbZ chekfj;ksa ls xzLr gSA

¶16

8&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶17

9&ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lq'khyk vxzoky izfr jkT; ¼,ulh-Vh- fnYyh½ 2020 ,l0 lh0 lh0 vkuykbZu ,l0 lh0 98 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj O;Dr fd;s vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 10&rnuqlkj vkosnd ds'ko izlkn ik.Ms; dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶18

11&mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k esa vkosnd dh fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa mls lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh larqf"V ij :i;k ipkl gtkj dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk;sxk%&

¶19

¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA ¼2½ vkosnd xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxkA ¼3½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxkA

¶20

12&;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosnd dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶21

Order Date :- 28.10.2023 A.

¶22

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Keshav Prasad Pandey v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Keshav Prasad Pandey v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Javed and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nitin Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Akhilesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Avinash Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another