Allowed

Anoop Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Oct 2023ABAIL/11111/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad granted anticipatory bail to Anoop Kumar Verma. The applicant is facing charges under the IPC for an illegal deduction of school fees involving non-compliance with court orders. The court found the applicant innocent, noted his clean record, and granted relief citing lack of reasonable cause for arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted conditioned upon appearing before the Court, no arrest of another person, and no release from bail.

Anoop Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200687

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11111 of 2023

¶5

Applicant :- Anoop Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Aditya Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1&vkosnd dh vksj ls iwjd'kiFk i= nkf[ky fd;k x;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A

¶8

2&;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 361 o"kZ 1992] vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 409] 120ch- Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh ftyk bVkok esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶9

3&la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud ds vuqlkj] oknh eqdnek gjuke flag dq'kokgk us vij ftykf/kdkjh] bVkok }kjk Fkkuk dksrokyh ftyk bVkokesa ,d izkFkZuk i= fnukad 4&5&1992 dks bl vk'k; dk izLrqr fd;k fd Jh iou dqekj oekZ] v/;{k izca/ku lfefr deZ{ks=] egkfo|ky; bVkok o vk'kqfyfid nsoh pju oekZ us bykgkckn cSad esa ,d la;qDr [kkrk [kksyk ftlesa dkyst dk 96]000@&:i;s vUrj.k fd;k x;kA mDr /kujkf'k /khjs&/khjs mDr [kkrs ls fudyrh jghA bl [kkrs dks Jh iou dqekj oekZ us Jh vuwi dqekj oekZ ds gLrk{kj dj [kksyk gS ftlij nsoh pju oekZ ds Lo;a ds gLrk{kj gS] ftldh tkap ds nkSjku] Jh nsoh pju oekZ lg[kkrsnkj dk c;ku fnukad 27&4&1992 dks fy;k ftlesa lg[kkrsnkj nsoh pju oekZ us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlus [kkrk la[;k 7967 vuwi dqekj us la;qDr [kksyk FkkA vuwi dqekj lEHkor;k Jh iou dqekj dk HkkbZ gSA [kkrs esa tek /kujkf'k vUrj.k ls vk;h FkhA cSad ls /ku dk vkgj.k ds fy, og o iou dqekj oekZ gLrk{kj djrs FksA iou dqekj] vuwi dqekj ds uke ls gLrk{kj djrk FkkA

¶10

4&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA 5&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k

¶11

¶12

fd iz'uxr ekeys esa vkosnd ,oa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrksa ds fo:} vkjksi i= U;k;ky; esa izsf"kr fd;k tk pqdk gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosnd ,d 63 o"khZ; o`} O;fDr gS tks dSalj ds jksx ls ihfMr gSA vkosnd dh vksj ls bl lEca/k esa fpfdRlh; izi= layXud 2 ds :i esa iwjd 'kiFki= ds lkFk vuqlayXud fd;k x;k gSA blh izdkj dk dFku vkosnd dh vksj ls iwjd 'kiFki= ds izLrj 4 esa vfHkdfFkr fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd orZeku le; esa vkosnd mB&cSB ugha ldrk gS vkSj pkjikbZ ij gh iMk jgrk gS rFkk vkosnd dk mipkj eq[; eU=h dks"k ls Hkh djk;k tk jgk gSA

¶13

6&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd iwoZ esa vkosnd ,oa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrksa }kjk bl U;k;ky; esa nkf.Md izdh.kZ izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 482 la[;k 46492 o"kZ 2018 ;ksftr fd;k x;k ftlesa vkns'k fnukad 20&12&2018 ds }kjk vUrfje jkgr iznku dh x;h rRi'pkr fo}ku voj U;k;ky; us ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Asian

¶14

Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & another Vs. Central Buereau of Investigation (2018) SCC 310 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ds vyksd esa vkosnd ds fo:} xSj tekurh; okj.V fuxZr fd;k ftlls {kqC/k gksdj vkosnd us fo}ku voj U;k;ky; ds le{k vfxze tekur gsrq izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ftls voj U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 19&7&2023 ds }kjk fujLr dj fn;k rRi'pkr vkosnd }kjk ;g orZeku vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; esa ;ksftr fd;k x;kA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd dks vk'kadk gS fd mls mijksDr of.kZr ekeys esa fxjQrkj fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fd mlds fo:} dksbZ fo'oluh; lk{; ugha gSA vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

¶15

7&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶16

8&ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk lq'khyk vxzoky izfr jkT; ¼,u-lhVh- fnYyh½ 2020 ,l0 lh0 lh0 vkuykbZu ,l0 lh0 98 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izdfr] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekeys ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj

¶17

¶18

O;Dr fd;s vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶19

9&rnuqlkj vkosnd vuwi dqekj oekZ dk vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶20

10&mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k esa vkosnd dh fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa mls lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh larqf"V ij :i;k ipkl gtkj dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk;sxk%&

¶21

¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA

¶22

¼2½ vkosnd xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxkA

¶23

¼3½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxkA

¶24

11&;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosnd dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶25

Order Date :- 17.10.2023 A.

¶26

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anoop Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anoop Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalu Kumar @ Chandrakeshwar Vs State of U.P.

Sulaiman Vs State of U.P.

Purananand Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Mithlesh Vs State of U.P.

Satyaveer Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmendra @ Dharm Vs State of U.P.