Rahul and Another v. State of U.P and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court No. 80 dismissed an anticipatory bail application as it had become infructuous on 6.1.2023.
Court No. 80 dismissed an anticipatory bail application as it had become infructuous on 6.1.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10232 of 2022
Applicant :- Rahul And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant states that this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.1.2023 A. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul
State Of U.P
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court