Perused the report dated 18.05.2023 submitted by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, which shows that the learned Judge was not aware that Shivam had been arrested and produced before the remand Magistrate. The remand papers were summoned by the learned Judge, and certainly, the explanation of the remand Magistrate about Shivam's custody from 13.05.2017 to 17.05.2017 is not very satisfactory. This Court would think that the remand Magistrate ought to have directed Shivam, when produced before him in error by the Police, to be produced before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya immediately, who would have dealt with Shivam whatever hour of the day it was. The production was required before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, and not before the remand Magistrate. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya is, therefore, right in her opinion, whatever has been expressed in the order dated 18.05.2023.