Today, learned counsel for the applicants has confined his relief to set aside the taking cognizance/summoning order dated 2nd November, 2022. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the taking cognizance/summoning order dated 2nd November, 2022 has been passed by the Special Judge without applying his judicial mind and the same is vague, ambiguous and nullity. He next submits that the perusal of the impugned order indicates that except for recording that on deeper scrutiny of the facts mentioned in the police documents, case diary and other prosecution documents, there is sufficient ground for taking cognizance and summoning the applicant, absolutely no reasons have been mentioned in support thereof. He further submits that it is settled law that every orders are to be judged on reasons recorded therein. He therefore, submits that the impugned order be set aside. Apart from the above, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the criminal case has been lodged under Sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)X SC/ST Act, but after recording the statement of complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and statement of witnesses under Section 202 Cr.P.C., learned Trial Court has summoned the applicant under 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)X SC/ST Act. It is further submitted that after amendment in SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(X) has been replaced by section 3(1)(r). It is also submitted that learned Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Badaun at the time of passing of the order has not applied his judicial mind. In view of the aforesaid illegality committed by the trial court while passing the impugned order, learned
