Single judge dismissed the applicant's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous on the counsel's submission that time had passed, discharging any interim order.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5078 of 2023
Applicant :- Anil Mittal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anshul Kumar Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohit Singh
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Aditya Kashyap, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anshul Kumar Singhal, learned counsel for the applicant states that due to passage of time this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the applicant, this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 2.5.2023 Kpy
Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Mittal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
Kavleshwar Prasad Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
