The High Court rejected the applicant's application to quash an FIR under Section 482 CrPC. The court found the application non-maintainable due to the specific directives issued by the Supreme Court in the Satendra Kumar Antil case regarding investigative diligence.
Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed as non-maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:104157
Court No. - 70
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 46704 of 2018
Applicant :- Monu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Pandey,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Nitendra Kumar
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
भधाकवत ककए कቚኌनधा, इस न्यधायधालय दधारधा कयोई कवकश्ቖ कनदरश जिधारटी करनवे ककी आवश्यकतधा नहीሻ हहै, क्योሬकक यह अपवेकधा ककी जिधातटी हहै कक सदंቚኌदंजधत अवर न्यधायधालय आववेदक कवे जिमधानत ्ቚधाथरनधा प्ቔ कयो कनस्तधाररत करतवे समय मधाननटीय उच्चतम न्यधायधालय दधारधा पहलवे सवे जिधारटी आवश्यक कदशधा -कनदरशोሬ कयो ध्यधान मम रखवेरधा।
Order Date :- 12.5.2023 Rahul
Digitally signed by :- RAHUL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of the FIR is maintainable on the ground of lack of cogency in the investigation report.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶10
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another ( Special Leave to Appeal Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Monu
State Of U.P. And Anr
Monu
Rakesh Kumar Pandey
Ashish Kumar
Satendra Kumar Antil
Central Bureau of Investigation
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
