Sushil Kumar Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that an application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. was misconceived and not maintainable as it was the second petition challenging non-bailable warrants by an applicant who failed to comply with previous court directions.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as misconceived and not maintainable.