Sunil and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing summoning order was not pressed on merit. Court directed expeditious bail decision and refused coercive action for three weeks pending surrender.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:222055
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42870 of 2023
Applicant :- Sunil And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the summoning order dated 18.10.2023 in Complaint Case No.859 of 2023 (Seeta vs. Sunil and others), under Sections 354, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C against the applicants nos.1, 2 & 3. & under section 323 I.P.C against applicant no.4, P.S. Garhmukteshwar, District Hapur, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Garhmuketeshwar, Hapur.
- On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.
- Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunil and 3 Others
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/42870/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court