The High Court dismissed the applicant's application under Section 482 CrPC as withdrawn after the applicant made a statement at the bar indicating they did not wish to press forward with the proceeding. The office was directed to return the impugned orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41749 of 2022
Applicant :- Shaheen Akhatar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the bar that he does not want to press this application and seeks to withdraw it.
In view of the above statement, this application under Section 482 CrPC is dismissed as withdrawn.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned orders to counsel for the applicant as per Rules.
Order Date :- 25.1.2023 Nadim
Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shaheen Akhatar
State Of U.P.
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
